طراحی و روان سنجی ابزار سنجش ابعاد محتوایی و ساختاری دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی و موسسات آموزش عالی سلامت (با رویکرد به تحول و نوآوری در آموزش عالی سلامت در قرن 21)

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی (Original Research)

نویسندگان

1 دکتری تخصصی مدیریت آموزش عالی، معاونت بهداشتی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل،بابل،ایران،

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

چکیده

زمینه‌و‌هدف: ابعاد محتوایی‌و‌ساختاری دانشگاه‌های علوم‌پزشکی و موسسات آموزش‌عالی سلامت، از عوامل حیاتی برای موفقیت ‌این سازمان‌ ‌ها می‌باشند. حرکت دانشگاه‌ها از ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎرﻫﺎی ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮی ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎرﻫﺎی نوین داﻧﺶ‌ﻣﺤﻮر نیازمند بررسی وضعیت این ابعاد است. این پژوهش جهت طراحی و روان سنجی ابزار سنجش ابعاد محتوایی‌و‌‌ساختاری سازمان دانشگاه‌های علوم‌‌پزشکی و موسسات آموزش‌ عالی‌سلامت انجام شد.
روش بررسی: این ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺒﯽ در ﺳﺎل تحصیلی 1398-1397 و طی دو مرحله ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ و اﻧﺠﺎم گردید. در ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﻃﺮاحی ﮔﻮیه‌ﻫﺎ و در ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﮐﻤﯽ روان‌سنجی ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ابزار اولیه با 139گویه طراحی گردید و پس از دو مرحله دلفی به124گویه تقلیل یافت. روایی صوری کمی ‌و ‌کیفی بررسی و پایایی آن به روش آلفای‌کرونباخ و پایایی‌ترکیبی تعیین و ابزارمذکور با تحلیل عامل تأییدی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Smart pls3 مورد تایید قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: پس از مراحل تعیین روایی‌و‌‌پایایی، پرسشنامه‌ای با 16 بعد و 86 گویه طراحی شد. مقدار شاخص روایی محتوایی همه گویه‌ها بالای 7/0به دست آمد. در بررسی روایی‌سازه، مقدار بار‌عاملی تمام گویه‌ها، مقادیر مناسبی عمدتا بالاتر از 7/0، پایایی هر دو ملاک(آلفای‌کرونباخ، پایایی‌ترکیبی) تمام ابعاد بالای 7/0، میانگین واریانس‌استخراج‌شده((AVE را در همه ابعاد بیشتر از 5/0 نشان داد.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این مطالعه شاهد مناسبی در خصوص استحکام ساختار عاملی و پایایی ابزار سنجش ابعاد محتوایی‌و‌‌ساختاری دانشگاه های علوم پزشکی کلان منطقه یک است. توسعه این ابزار می‌تواند جهت سنجش ابعاد محتوایی‌و‌‌ساختاری درسایر دانشگاه‌های علوم‌پزشکی و موسسات آموزش‌عالی سلامت مورد توجه و استفاده پژوهشگران قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Design and Psychometric Assessment of the Structural and Content Dimensions of Medical Universities and Higher Education Institutions: with an Approach to Development and Innovation in Medical Education In the 21st century

نویسندگان [English]

  • jamileh aqatabar roudbari 1
  • Taraneh Enayati 2
1 PhD, Higher Education Management, Vice Chancellor for Health, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2 Department of Educational Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Purpose: The content and structural dimensions of medical universities and health education institutions are critical to the success of these organizations. The movement of universities from the disciplines to the new knowledge based Organization requires the examination of the status of these dimensions. This study was conducted to design and psychometrically evaluate the content and structural dimensions of the organization of medical universities and higher education institutes.

Analysis method: This was done in the academic year of 1398-1397 and in two stages. In the qualitative research, design items and then took a psychometric questionnaire. The initial tool was designed with 139 items and was reduced to 124 items after two Delphi stages. Quantitative and qualitative formal validity was investigated and its reliability was determined by Cronbach's alpha method and hybrid reliability.

Findings: After determining the validity and reliability, a questionnaire with 16 dimensions and 86 items was designed. The value of the content validity index of all items was above 0.7. In the study of structural validity, the factor load factor of all items, appropriate values mainly above 0.7, reliability of both criteria (Alpha Cronbach, composite reliability) all dimensions above 0.7, average variance and extracted (AVE )showed more than 0.5 in all dimensions.

Conclusion: The results of this study are a good indication of the strength of the factor structure and reliability of the content measurement tools of the content and structural dimensions of the major universities of medical sciences in Region One. This tool can be considered and used by researchers to measure the content and structural dimensions in other universities of medical sciences and higher education institutions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Psychometric
  • Structural Dimensions
  • Content Dimensions
  • University of Medical Sciences

مراجع

  1. Moghali A, Darvish H, abbasi N, mohammadi F .Study and Ranking the Factors Influencing onTransformational Organization Model In Fars Education Organization(Case Study: Fars province education organization. Pub manage Res.2016; 9(31):29-50. [Persian].
  2. Aghababaei R, Rahimi H. The study of structural aspects of knowledge-based organizations in kashan University of Medical Sciences. rme. 2016; 8(2):1-8[Persian].
  3. Yaspers K. University idea. Translated by Parsa M, Parsa M.Ghoghnos Publishers.2015; 103. [Persian].
  4. Molaee Z, Asili M, Ghadiriyan A.Organizational University School of Organization Strategy.Tadbir.2009; 204. [Persian].
  5. Allen M. The corporate university. New York: Amacom.2002.
  6. Salarianzadeh M.H, Abedi, A.A, Mohaghegh B, Talebi F, Mohammadzadeh Fayaz A et al. Regulations of University Structure and Organizations / Faculties of Medical Sciences and Health Services. 2018. Office of Management Development and Development - Department of Engineering [Persian].
  7. abdolahzade estakhry G, heidarzadeh A, yazdani S, Taheri ezbarami Z. Identification of Top Medical School's Educational Structure in the World. Rme. 2014; 6 (2):19-27. [Persian].
  8. Salarianizadeh, Mohammad Hossein, Abedi, Ali Akbar, Mohaghegh, Bahram, Talebi, Fatemeh, Mohammadzadeh Fayyaz, Ahmad et al. Center for Management Development and Administrative Transformation - Organization Engineering Group.2018.
  9. Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, with the cooperation of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Designing Organizational Structures (after Special Assignment of Middle Managers).2016.
  10. Ahmadi F, Shirazi E. Design and explain environmental dimensions of trauma director organization in public sector. 2015; 3(2):91-106.
  11. Nozari H, karimi A. The Role of Formal and Informal Relationships (Social Relations Network) in Students’ Employment (Case Study: Kharazmi University). Social Welfare. 2017; 17(64):161-198.
  12. Daft, R. Organizational Theory and Design (7­ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South Western Publishing. 2001.
  13. Turani, Soghand, Mehdi Zanganeh Baygi, Mehdi, Salehi, Massoud, Chooban Ghale Jogh, Bahram. Investigating the Relationship between Content Dimensions and Structural Dimensions in the Organizational Structure of Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital in Zahedan. Journal of Health System Research, 2015. 11(1).
  14. Tofighi Sh., Chaghary M., Amerioun A., Karimi Zarchi A. A.. Effect of organizational changes on organizational health indicators and its relationship with organizational effectiveness. J Mil Med. 2011; 13 (3) :173-179
  15. Zheng W, Yang B, McLean G.N. Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research 63 .2010; 763-771.
  16. Victoria E. Díaz, Pierre Mercier, Celine Pinsent. A Knowledge Management Framework for Institutional Research" In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research. Published online: 21 Aug 2017; 155-178.
  17. Robbins, Stephen (1943). Organizational theory, structure and organizational design. Translation: Alwani, Seyed Mohammad, Danaeifard, Hassan, 2009. Tehran: Ishraqi Publications.
  18. Shanafelt T, Trockel M, Ripp J, and Murphy M. L, Sandborg C, & Bohman B. Building a program on well-being: key design considerations to meet the unique needs of each organization. Academic Medicine.2019; 94(2), 156-161.
  19. Sadeghi Malamiri, M., Khoshzad, S. Impacts of Rational, Natural and Systemic Organizational Theories on Creativity. Police Management Studies Quarterly, 2010; 5(2): 272-304[Persian].
  20. Barnard Z, der Merwe D.V.Innovative management for organizational sustainability in higher education", International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education .2016; 17(2):208-227.
  21. Parhizkar M, Jokar A, Darini V. Identification of factors influencing on organizational innovation based on open innovation paradigm: case study, publication industry. Industrial Management Studies, 2014; 11(31): 101-125. [Persian].
  22. Haghighi Kaffash M, Hajipoor B, Mazloomi N, Momeni M. 'Modeling of organizational innovation ability', Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management.2015; 3(4):31-42. [Persian].
  23. Clark B.R.Creating Entrepreneurial Universities, Organizational pathway of Transformation, Oxford: pergamon press.1998.
  24. Nasiri Valyk Beny F, Shigani Mani S. The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Development in Bu Ali Sina University. Journal of Development & Evolution Mnagement. 2016; (26): 45-51. [Persian].
  25. Pirmoradi H R,Nazari M, Heidari A, Arabi  S M. Model for Evaluating Readiness for Strategic Change in Energy Sector Organizations .Rahbord.2019;27(87):35-60 .[Persian].
  26. Ziapour, A., Khatony, A., Kianipour, N., & Jafary, F. Identification and analysis of labor productivity components based on achieve model (case study: Staff of Kermanshah university of medical sciences). Global journal of health science.2015; 7(1), 315.
  27. pourabbasi A, Haghdoost A, Akbari H, Kheiry Z, Dehnavieh R, Noorihekmat S, Rahimi S, Larijani B. packages for reform and innovation in medical education in Islamic Republic of Iran; a conceptual framework. Journal of Medicine and Cultivation, 2016; 26(1): 45-50. [Persian].
  28. Akbari M, Danesh M, Sakhdari K, Dolatshah P.The Effect of Organizational Preparedness Corporate Entrepreneurship on Innovation Performance and Financial Performance: The mediating role of Entrepreneurial orientation. 2017; 5(1):123-146. [Persian].
  29. Samari E, yamini sorkhabi M, sahlehi omran A, graenejad gh. Investigating and Identifying the Effective Factors in the Process of "University Development" in Iranian State Universities. J manage system.2014; 2(4):67-100. [In Persian].
  30. Barani S, Faghih A, Najafbagy R. Barriers to Administrative Reforms in Iran: A Study on Organizational Culture. Manag Res. 2017; 10(36):5-30. [In Persian].
  31. Ludwig L, Starr S. Libraryas place: results of Delphi study. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2005; 93(3): 315-327.
  32. Broder Fingert S, Carter A, Pierce K, Stone W. L, Wetherby A, ScheldrickC, Feinberg E. Implementing systems-based innovations to improve access to early screening, diagnosis, and treatment services for children with autism spectrum disorder: An Autism Spectrum Disorder Pediatric, Early Detection, Engagement, and Services network study. Autism. (2018); 1362361318766238.
  33. Sohrabi Z, Mohammadbakhshi N, Salehi L. Design and Psychometrics of an Assessment Tool for University Characteristics as a Learning Organization from the perspective of Educational Leaders. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2015; 15:543-554. [Persian].
  34. Selseleh M, Moghli A. Designing and testing a value-based organizational model for Tavanir (power industry holding company). Iranian journal of management sciences.2013; 6(24):113-140. [Persian].
  35. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Statistical Methods and Analyzes with a Look at Biological and Health Sciences Research Methods. Tehran, Academic Jahad Publishing Organization, Second Edition. 2011. [Persian].
  36. Vakili M M, Hidarnia A R, Niknami S. Development and Psychometrics of an Interpersonal Communication Skills Scale (A.S.M.A) among Zanjan Health Volunteers. Hayat. 2012; 18(1):5-19. [Persian].
  37. Sarmad Z, Bazargan A, Hejazi e. Research Methods in Behavioral Science.Tehran, agah Publication. 2019; 7. [Persian].
  38. Heravi-Karimooi M, Anoosheh M, Foroughan M,Sheykhi MT, Hajizadeh E. Designing and Determining psychometric properties of the DomesticElder Abuse Questionnaire. Iran J Ageing2010; 5(15): 7-21. [Persian].
  39. Lawshe C. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personal Psychology. 1975; 28(4):563-75.
  40. Ingersoll-Dayton B. The development of culturally sensitive measures for research on ageing. Ageing and Society. 2011; 31(3):355-70.
  41. DPolit DF, Tatano Beck C. Essentials of Nursing Research. Appraising Evidence for NursingPractice. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2010.
  42. Parhizkar M, Pooratashi M. Comprehensive model of improving professional skills and entrepreneurship. Two Quarterly Teaching in the Humanities.2016; 1:133-154. [Persian].
  43.  Rezaii Sadrabadi A.A, Naebzadeh Sh, Rabani M. The effect of education on the commitment and quality of service with internal marketing approach in the hospital martyr Sadoughi of Yazd. Journal of Applied Research in Management and Accounting. 2017; 4:1-11. [Persian].
  44. Barry S P, Diarra Nama A. J, Kirigia J. M, Bakeera S, Somanje H. Monitoring and evaluation of health sector reforms in the WHO African region. East African medical journal. 2009; 86: S25-S32.
طب و تزکیه
دوره 29، شماره 2
تیر 1399
صفحه 88-103

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار